While making mistakes is part of the entrepreneurial journey, there’s a lot of value in studying the mistakes of other businesses, too. After all, prevention is better than cure, right?
Here we explore some notable strategic misfires from big brands, and the lessons they can offer small business owners.
1. New Coke
Strategy error: Thinking too much about the competition
Why it failed: In 1985, blind taste tests suggested consumers preferred the sweeter taste of Coca-Cola’s competitor, Pepsi.
In response, Coca-Cola reformulated its recipe, marking the first formula change in 99 years coining it ‘New Coke’. Coca-Cola’s aim was to revitalise the brand, show they were in touch with their consumers and continue to remain market leader in the cola market. What the taste tests didn’t show though was the strong connection consumers had with the existing brand.
The result? A negative reaction from many, particularly the southern US states, some of whom considered Coca-Cola part of their regional identity. The company received over 40,000 calls and letters expressing anger or disappointment. Protest groups started popping up and die-hard fans began stock piling original recipe Coke in their basements.
PepsiCo jumped on the marketing opportunity, running ads where a first-time Pepsi drinker says, “Now I know why Coke did it!”.
In 1985 the original recipe Coca-Cola returned to shelves, making the news and front page of many major publications. While this is seen as one of the biggest marketing blunders in history, the brand remains strong as has since seen great success in the industry.
Lessons:
- Don’t tamper with an established, successful brand
- Take time to work out what it is your customers value about your brand
- Refrain from making knee-jerk reactions
- Don’t overthink your product compared to competitors
- Don’t underestimate consumers’ emotional attachments to original products
2. Apple (without Steve Jobs)
Strategy error: Too many product lines
Why it failed: When Steve Jobs returned to Apple in 1997, he found the tech giant in a bit of a mess. Profits had plummeted, with the company in crisis. Jobs’ response? Slash the product line down to a few core items (it was making 350 different products at the time!), with the goal of making those items “insanely great.” The product menu was cut down to 10, shifting Apple’s focus back to the iMac, the PowerBook and then the iPod, iPhone and the iPad. This focus directly contributed to Apple’s comeback.
While the Apple we know today is nowhere near the state it was in 25 years ago, it’s argued that the technology giant seems to be losing some of its product focus.
Take Apple’s iPad line-up for example - iPad Pro, iPad Air, iPad 10th generation, iPad 9th generation, iPad mini… While choice is good for consumers, you also run the risk of creating confusion in trying to appeal to everyone. As one of the most profitable companies in the world, Apple faces pressure to deliver financial success each year and in its pursuit, might be chasing markets that might not be best suited. By adding more product categories to appeal to more consumers, it risks allowing overall product quality to suffer. While this isn’t the case currently, it’s a genuine concern amongst Apple fans.
Steve Jobs: Apple Matrix Strategy in 1997
Lesson: Less can be more